Search This Blog
Monday, 29 April 2013
Mississauga May 9th Wi-Fi In Schools Info Session / Keynote and Other Speakers
Sunday, 28 April 2013
We have each other. Pay it forward.
Richard Farver, deceased at age 29
Rich deserved the right to know
The San Francisco Supervisors are being pressured by their industry friendly Mayor to repeal their landmark Cell Phone Right to Know law (unanimous vote, 2011); 25 cities & states are waiting to do the same; if SF caves, they will all stop in their tracks.
The Monograph states:
"Positive associations have been observed between exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless phones and glioma (LETHAL BRAIN CANCER) and acoustic neuroma" (p.421).
Children are particularly vulnerable as “the average exposure from use of the same mobile phone is higher by a factor of 2 in a child’s brain and higher by a factor of 10 in the bone marrow of the skull.”
Industry has trillions of dollars- WE HAVE YOU!
THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.
Ellie, Alan, Zack, Jordan, Crystal and Mandy Marks
On the behalf of many other victims
(please bcc us at cabtasf@hotmail.com)
Copy and paste the short note below into body of your email and send to:
Norman.yee@sfgov.org
John.avalos@sfgov.org
Malia.cohen@sfgov.org
London.breed@sfgov.org
Eric.l.mar@sfgov.org
David.chiu@sfgov.org
David.campos@sfgov.org
Katy.tang@sfgov.org
Jane.kim@sfgov.org
Mark.farrell@sfgov.org
Scott.wiener@sfgov.org
Keep Cell Phone Right to Know legislation intact; vote no against the settlement
Short email note (type your name at the bottom, you do not need to add where you reside):
-------------------------------------
Dear Esteemed San Francisco Supervisors,
Please stand firm on May 7 to keep your landmark Cell Phone Right to Know legislation intact; vote no against the settlement. People deserve the right to know advisories at the point of sale related to a radiation emitting device used by nearly every man, woman and child daily. The World Health Organization states this radiation is a possible human carcinogen based on an increased risk of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.
Please continue to stand with your constituents and not with the telecom industry. Please continue to employ your Precautionary Principle ordinance. You will ultimately be saving taxpayers’ money as brain tumor rates are on the rise and the average cost of initial treatment of a brain tumor is over half a million dollars.
Thank you.
Respectfully,
[your name]
-------------------------------------
Monday, 22 April 2013
EMAIL SIGNATURES HAVE IMPACT and you can have fun with them
[updated June 15, 2021]
[This post is about email signatures. If you also do other types of digital or paper communications that can have manual or automatic signatures or stamps, I hope you'll consider similar opportunities. Also refer to another old post of mine, perhaps the instructions in it would be different now but surely still possible It's easy to Change iPhone's Email Signature.]
I encourage everyone to be pleasant, informative, creative, and even fun in email signatures — for all our communications, whether the communication is for strictly business purposes, personal non-business communications, or pleasant advocacy. You don't have to try to save-the-world with each email signature, but collectively that's what you'll be doing. And you don't know whose life your email signature might hugely benefit or even save!
Put it out there, because you can! Pleasantly. Not always with a URL.
For example, years ago, worldwide many companies' signatures included a point like this:
"Think about the environment before you print this email."
That was stated and widely shared with enthusiasm, compassion, and respect, as a very desirable goal. We feel the same way and the environment will be just as thankful for our email signatures that can make a similarly beneficial impact.
Current examples:
1. For my interactions in my freelance transcribing business, here's what I use. Sometimes a recipient will ask me about it. And I know that it hasn't caused me to lose any clients:
Barb Payne
Information Time
barb@transcriptionhero.com
~ for cleaner air we use corded devices to connect with wireless off
2. For my personal (non-business, non-EMF) interactions, I have a large selection of signatures to choose from. These are only a few:
~ for cleaner air i use corded devices to connect with wireless off, i hope you do too
or
~ rockin’ my faster ethernet connection with wireless off
or
~ step away from the glowing rectangle more often
- - - - - - - - - -
[below is my original post in 2013]
Here's my gift to the Earth for Earth Day. Keep in mind that it isn't solely humans affected by electroSMOG. I hope you can easily copy-paste from the list below. If not, please let me know by email EnergyCanaries@bell.net. Use them in good health!
X don't dump radiation into your body
practice SAFE TECH
~ sent from my fast safer WIRED internet connection
~ practice SAFE TECH
~ step away from the glowing rectangle more often
No one’s reaching into my brain
Resistance is not futile
provide cord/cable connections
reduce firsthand & secondhand wireless radiation exposures
tell 2 ppl to tell 2 ppl
reduce firsthand & secondhand wireless radiation exposure
standard wireless = radiation emissions (not magic)
reduce exposures ... firsthand & secondhand
updates released in 2013+ ... bioinitiative.org
standard wireless = radiation emissions (not magic)
reduce exposures ... firsthand & secondhand
~ reduce the wireless radiation inside your body
don’t dump radiation into your body
wired = speed & security & my body thanks me
iexistworld.org
Q Why?
A To reduce 1st-hand & 2nd-hand wireless radiation exposure.
F What you can’t see CAN hurt you. Wireless devices and networks connect because they continually generate unnatural electromagnetic waves that flood your environment. These waves are radiation that can reach inside your body. When your network is off or when you completely power off a device, you reduce the radiation in the environment and in your body.
iexistworld.org
tell 2 ppl to tell 2 ppl
PDO is the way to go!
Personal Devices Off
reduce your body’s dose of “e-smog” radiation
if you have questions about this please ask me
The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance — it is the illusion of knowledge.
~ Daniel J. Boorstin
standard wireless = radiation emissions (not magic)
reduce exposures ... firsthand & secondhand
Each wireless communication task performed by an electronic device sends radiation into your body that interferes with your body’s normal functioning (whether you notice it or not). Each of those wireless tasks also sends radiation into the bodies of everyone within the coverage areas of the network your device is connected to, and into the bodies of everyone within the coverage area of the network your recipient uses, and into the bodies of everyone within the coverage area of all the network equipment used to connect the sender’s network with the recipient’s network. From this moment on, please consider whether or not your wireless task is so important enough that it justifies physically damaging your body (firsthand) and physically damaging everyone else’s bodies (secondhand). If your device is network-enabled inside a public transit vehicle (even if it can’t connect with a network), the mostly metal shell of the vehicle causes the radiation to bounce around so much that passengers can be exposed to hundreds of times more radiation.